home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
021792
/
0217470.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-02-24
|
5KB
|
98 lines
<text id=92TT0365>
<title>
Feb. 17, 1992: Nixon:Still a Global Feel
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
Feb. 17, 1992 Vanishing Ozone
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
BOOKS, Page 80
Nixon: Still a Global Feel
</hdr><body>
<p>By George J. Church
</p>
<qt>
<l>SEIZE THE MOMENT: AMERICA'S CHALLENGE IN</l>
<l>A ONE-SUPERPOWER WORLD</l>
<l>By Richard Nixon</l>
<l>Simon & Schuster; 322 pages; $25</l>
</qt>
<p> Looks like we have finally seen the last of the new
Nixons. Anyone who remembers his campaign and White House
oratory will recognize the old Nixon's rhetorical devices from
the first page of his new book, the ninth he has written. Once
again we encounter the continual setting up of straw men, the
self-righteous refusal to take (or in this case recommend) the
easy and popular course, even--Lord help us!--the
incidentally-I-have-negotiated-with-Khrushchev bit. Some of the
old class resentment and malice toward foes linger too.
Doubtless Nixon genuinely believes Boris Yeltsin to be like
Khrushchev in concealing a razor-sharp intelligence behind a
somewhat oafish exterior. But when he scorns the American
"foreign policy elite" for sniffing at Yeltsin because the
Russian might not know which fork to use at a state banquet, he
is rather obviously settling some old personal scores, and when
he calls Mikhail Gorbachev "a Soviet version of Adlai
Stevenson," he does not mean it as a compliment.
</p>
<p> But the old Nixon also survives in a far more favorable
sense: he has lost none of his sure instinct for gauging the
force and direction of the tides of power in world affairs. For
example, writing immediately after the failed Moscow putsch of
last August, he predicts with remarkable prescience that the
Soviet Union will dissolve into a "commonwealth of free and
equal nations" that "will coordinate, not govern, the actions
of republics." Consequently, his advice on foreign policy is
well worth the attention even of those who still gag on hearing
his name.
</p>
<p> Nixon's central thesis is that the collapse of the Soviet
Union presents the U.S. both with an unparalleled chance to help
shape a more stable and peaceful world and with a great danger
of a lapse into chaos and turmoil if the nation misguidedly
turns its attention totally inward. He offers quite detailed
advice on what to do about specific areas of potential trouble,
generally in a spirit of cold-blooded realism. Again and again
he insists on the continued importance of military power. If the
U.S. wants to retain economic and political influence in the new
Europe, he says, it had better keep some troops there as well.
Punishing China for the 1989 massacres of prodemocracy
demonstrators by enacting a total economic boycott might be
"emotionally satisfying" to Americans, but the U.S. "cannot
effect positive change by ruining China's economy." The thing
to do is keep China's free-enterprise economic innovations alive
until the "neo-Stalinists" now running the country die and are
succeeded by leaders who realize that "economic reform without
political reform is ultimately unsustainable." Arabs and
Israelis, says Nixon, will go on hating each other no matter
what happens; the only thing that has ever been able to move
them toward peace has been a belief that "the status quo was
more painful than a potential compromise." But that very
consideration offers ground for hope, since the U.S. has "the
leverage to make the status quo more painful than a proposed
settlement."
</p>
<p> But what Nixon calls "the hard rock of enduring
geopolitical realities" is honeycombed by an unexpected vein of
moralism. The U.S. must continue aid to poor countries, says
Nixon, at least partly because it has a "moral obligation" to
help relieve suffering. More generally, the U.S. must spurn the
suddenly fashionable new isolationism, not only for the expected
practical reasons (its security and prosperity are inextricably
bound up with those of the world at large) but also because it
has "a moral imperative to use our awesome capabilities as the
world's only superpower to promote freedom and justice."
</p>
<p> O.K., O.K. Anyone who has more than a casual memory of the
campaign gut fighter and unindicted co-conspirator of the
Watergate cover-up will be irresistibly tempted to say "Look
who's talking about morality" and snort in derision. So snort--and then pay attention. This time, the man is right.
</p>
</body></article>
</text>